In a quote from John Mill, “ To fine a criminal shows respect for property, or to imprison him, for personal liberty? Equally unreasonable is to think that taking the life of a man who has taken that of another is showing disrespect for human life. On the contrary, we demonstrate our respect in the most evident way by adopting a rule according to which whoever violates this right in another loses it for himself, and that while no other crime he can commit deprives him of his right to life, this will be". Everyone's life is precious, but at what price? Is it right to let a murderer do what he wants? Reader, please take a moment and think about this issue. The problem will always be a conflict of beliefs and moral standards. The Argument The rhetorical appeal is the logos, the rational appeal to the reader's ability to reason logically based on the evidence; pathos, an emotional appeal to the reader's beliefs and feelings, such as anecdotes or "human interest" stories; and ethos, ethical appeal is the credibility of the writer and his attempt to appear informed and fair. The appeal of Mr. Muhlhausen's logo is strong. He provided numerous facts and statistics from many sources and used expert opinions in the economic field to show the effect on society when capital punishment is used correctly. It lacks Mr. Muhlhausen's pathetic charm, offers neither an anecdote nor a "human interest" story. His conservative beliefs are reflected in his writings and the position he takes with his statement. Muhlhausen's ethical appeal is credible, he recognizes the concerns of the other side regarding the death penalty. He mentions that others have changed their minds about the death penalty, saying that the quality of these findings has led some legitimate researchers, initially limited to the end of the sentence for good reasons, to reconsider their case. He maintained a neutral tone and did not use negative words or insults in his article. He demonstrated an article full of facts to support his claim. He doesn't follow the line of the order with his reasons, and that was a bit'