Numerous interpretations of Hawthorne's Scarlet Letter have been published, exhibited, and debated since the creation of the original novel. However, the “word and silence” motif is explored by Harold Bloom in his book Bloom's Modern Critical Interpretations. Bloom states that the characters in the novel see “speech as an act of power,” meaning that authority is established around conversation in the novel (1). In this extended critical writing, Bloom compares the different characters in the family to specifically explain their role in the novel's dialogue through comparison and contrast. Use a combination of first and third person speech and finally use a logical and analytical tone to explain the meaning of the reason for the story. He manages to make his point through effective use of points of view and an analytical tone, but his argument is weakened by his imperfect association of characters. Bloom joins Dimmesdale and Chillingworth through the motif of limited speech, known as the "'secret bond' not to be spoken of" (2). Bloom begins by explaining that each character is intrinsic to this type of communication as each requires Hester to contain one's identity in silence. This significant connection brought up by Bloom really highlights his perspective on the importance of the motif, limited speech, in the story as "silence blurs the differences between husband and lover" (1). of Bloom in the association of his characters is when he suddenly joins Hawthorne and Dimmesdale. Both hide their names to some extent. Hawthorne was said to "keep silent, hide [his] name and story from the text for [his] writing" just like Dimmesdale. hides his name. With the introduction of Hawthorne as a foil for Dimmesdale, t...... middle of paper ......wn understanding” (8). and silence” in great detail. He easily shows his point through the successful use of his analytical tone and narrative perspectives. His association with the characters works well but is crippled by the lack of further connections to the characters. For examining a minimally discussed topic before the article, Bloom presents his opinion in a very clear and organized manner and connects with the audience a couple of times, unlike most critics. In his writing, Bloom ethically appeals to dramatic levels through his non-radical tone and connection with the audience during his first-person narrative. Overall Bloom's piece is valid and explains his points well. Even if one obstacle in his exam is slightly detrimental, he recognizes many of his other flaws and works with them to actually assist his writing..