Over the years several studies have shown that juvenile risk assessment of females is an important part of our justice system. Our system failed to meaningfully test young females, in the correct way with an assessment specific to them. This test should have an accurate form that can help provide guidance to these juvenile offenders who are at high risk of reoffending. Another factor that is not taken into consideration is the different cultural and ethical response between black, Hispanic and white women? Age affects each woman's prediction of recurrence differently. In the articles, the scholars wrote about carrying out sample tests to extend the prediction of recidivism among juveniles to compare those with higher delinquency rates. These testing methods are also intended to identify age-related differences that might make tests more accurate among adolescents. Women's juvenile justice should properly entrust the agency with the administration of the assessment test in order to reduce the future. These tools help prevent recidivism among minors as age and ethnicity are important factors in assessing to prevent and reduce future offenders. However, another important fact is that state-led trials are evaluated to see whether high-risk women benefit from high intervention programs. The Structured Assessment of Violent Risk Among Youth (SAVRY) is one test that indicates inclusion in supervision for high-risk youth. Introduction Risk assessment is a necessary process in the youth system as it is a great tool that will help analyze the life of a female offender. There are a number of factors that need… half paper… as it can help predict violence and non-violent crimes, as well as for recidivism in risk factors. The following is the most recent result of the SAVRY study, a list of 24 statistical and dynamic risk factors based on a comprehensive review of the scientific literature (Penney, 2010). Most importantly, many long-standing debates concern the use of clinical predictors when it is all about judging individual levels of risk of violence against underage women. How can this research show that, over time, given this time of study, better prediction and awareness can help in future decision making? In a meta-analysis of 67 published studies, the conclusion was that making a decision from the assessment tools made valid clinical judgment to be used to predict recidivism (Perrault, 2012, pp. 487-505) .