An interesting point is that it gives us a different type of article. He definitely used logos because his logic and reasoning are good and it supports his facts. He approached the article differently than Rose and it is important to be aware of some of the information he presented to us. For example, “With this in mind, I believe that the central goal of higher education institutions like Sarah Lawrence College should be to graduate “world-ready” critical thinkers with the ability to acquire new skills and adapt to a landscape rapidly changing. who can put their learning to use in the world, both immediately and 50 years from now.” This is a good point. There may be an A-level student who can apply their knowledge to the real world, but you may also have B-level students who can make a huge impact in our society. The Ethos element is not so clear in Lawrence's article. Without any outside research it is unclear to the reader whether Karen Lawrence is a reliable source. He seems to know what he is talking about, but without knowing his educational and professional background readers may question his authority on the topic. Pathos is also not so visible. In this article you do not refer to your personal self and experiences. Sometimes this isn't a problem, but for this topic I think the pathos added to