To understand the influence of Nazi anti-smoking policies, we must look at the roots from which the ideology originated. The Fuhrer, himself a smoker in his youth, considered the habit a waste of money and had an irresistible hatred for smoking and tobacco use. He spoke out against the harmful effects of tobacco smoking, including tobacco poisoning, attributing its use to the loss of "so many excellent men". Hitler considered tobacco a symbol of "decadence". Furthermore, he believed that the indigenous population of North America, the Native Americans, retaliated against whites by influencing tobacco use after whites introduced liquor into society. As a result of such radical views on smoking, Hitler would be the first national leader to have advocated anti-smoking sentiments. Also known for rewarding his close associates and friends if they managed to beat their addiction, he was irritated by the smoking habits of Hermann Goering and Magda Goebbels. The powerful cult of personality built around the Fuhrer together with the complexities of National Socialist ideology aided him in the creation of the propaganda, so crucial in achieving the master plan, the domination of the master Aryan race, the Herrenvolk. Given the wide sphere of influence that Nazi society had on the world today, studying the results of such restrictive policies leads us to a simple question of how effective they were. Recent work has indicated that while some types of science were annihilated under the Nazi administration, other types thrived. Sciences of a connected nature were particularly authorized, as were sciences that fit into the larger system of Nazi isolation and annihilation... at the center of paper lists, the leading entertainer of the anti-smoking promulgation was Adolf Hitler. One reason behind the absence of such activities may be that the dictator's knowledge of the Nazi administration in anti-smoking deliberations in workplaces, on public transport and in schools has long remained in famous memory. This may be one of several variables outside the control of current health promoters that influence whether people start smoking anyway or quit once they start. The historical context of smoking and health in Germany, which cannot be considered to have begun in the post-war world with a population free from smoking restrictions, shows the lack of direct dispersion models, both analyzes in an open approach and developments in conducted from the most educated to the least educated areas of pop culture.