Skepticism, fundamentally, consists of removing the disturbances that arise from confrontation with incompatible worldviews. When you begin to reflect on philosophy and perspectives, you discover that for every explanation that claims to establish something true about the world there is another equally persuasive force that claims equivalence. Then you are unable to agree to either opposing account, which first leads to suspense and then, presumably, tranquility will be found. This process forms the foundation of the philosophy of skepticism. A skeptic (one who believes in skepticism) should live without faith (adoxastôs), all certainties are labeled as unreasonable and constitute an obstacle to a peaceful mind, like building a house on a sand pit. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay From ancient times onward, skeptics have developed arguments to undermine the claims of dogmatic philosophers and theologians. A unifying feature, common to all ancient skepticisms, is that they all emphasize recognition of our epistemic limitations. Skepticism throughout ancient history played a dynamic role in forcing dogmatic philosophers to find stronger foundations for their opinions. It forces reexamination of claims about prior knowledge and has stimulated thinkers to develop new theories to address skeptical problems. Unlike other proclaimed philosophers of the time such as Plato and Aristotle, the most extreme skeptics avoided having opinions and, fundamentally, disbelieving their senses in any aspect. Pyrrhon of Elis, one of the founding fathers of skepticism (creating a form later known as Pyrrhonian), explores the idea that one should abstain from truth and avoid postulating final truths for a calm and conscious life. Pirrone distrusted his senses to an extreme degree, he was presumably indifferent to certain norms of social behavior. Pyrrho thought that since appearances are often deceiving, he could not be sure that any harm could come from this. He thought it was best to distance oneself from firm beliefs because firm beliefs always involve disappointment. He explains "why being afraid of ferocious dogs, just because they bark and bare their teeth, doesn't mean they will run at you and bite you, and if they do it won't necessarily hurt you, it's just your senses think it hurts." It is notable that the history of philosophy can be seen, in part, as a struggle with skepticism, which have developed each other through history to the extent that we see them today. Although there are contemporary skeptics, who are, for luck, much less extremists. In Western thought, skepticism has raised fundamental epistemological questions. Considering the variety of human experience, it has been asked whether it is possible to determine which experiences are true who attempt to gradually erode the metaphysical and theological foundations of all historical and ancient theories. Although modern skeptics are less extreme in nature, they may have been influenced by the historical extreme skeptics and are beginning to abandon the search for certain and indubitable foundations of knowledge. human. Ultimately, skeptical questions formed the foundation of philosophy. Philosophers challenge dogma and it is through this that all philosophers become skeptics. The vagaries of skepticism can be defined and refined by these three questions; How are things really? What attitude should we adapt to them? What will happen if we don't adopt this attitude? And?