Topic > The Ode to the Nightingale by John Keats; Analyzing the third structure

Analysis of "The Nightingale Hymn" The third stanza of John Keats's "Hymn to the Nightingale" is of particular significance. The poem praises a nightingale who had built a nest outside Charles Brown's estate in Hampstead. The bird symbolizes nature, a thing of beauty and purity, which is juxtaposed with its antithesis of humanity. These lines are written to describe the woes of manhood and humanity as opposed to the goodness of the nightingale. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The stanza begins with the voice of the poem speaking dreamily of the fading of the distant “21” and the desire to dissolve the “21.” Talk about completely forgetting “what you among the leaves never knew” “21”. This aura of mystery is a bit of a cliché in literature, think of “he who must not be named” or “the love that dares not speak its name”. The voice of the poem speaks of humanity in a way that seeks to protect the innocence of nature from the knowledge of what it is. Choosing to frame humanity in this way could be a way to temporarily reverse the fact that it is too late to truly save nature from humanity's influence, i.e. civilization, industrialization, etc. In the next line, Keats uses the rule of three to associate disease words with human nature, such as “weariness” “fever” and “agitation” “23”. It provides the image of men sitting hearing each other moan "24", sitting because they are unable to do anything about the fact that man's life in an unnatural world comes with its share of troubles and trials that all they must suffer, albeit needlessly, according to Romantic era critics, who see the contemporary structure of their lives as bad both for the nature it was destroying and for the men who created it. After two lines describing illness and death to both those who are old and young “25 and 26”, the voice of the poem states that “but to think is to be full of pain” “27”. It is indeed a drastic statement to say that one of the most basic functions of a human being, thinking, brings nothing but misery. This sentence could express two things. The first possibility is that this line is hyperbole used to indicate the fact that the pain humanity brings is inevitable for both humans and nature. The second possibility is that this thought, an action usually seen as exclusively human, is not simply something basic that brings pain above all else, but is something that the voice does, a romantic, and subsequently brings its own special form of pain. . The Romantic poet could easily lament their perception of the tragedy of their situation. It may well be that the poet feels that their radical romantic outlook is as much a burden as a gift, since they are surrounded by others who do not share their ideas or are unaware of the flaws that man has created upon their lives. the earth. Knowledge is pain as much, if not more, than power for the Romantic poet. Towards the end of the poem, Keats stops talking about humanity and mentions “Beauty” “29” in the personified image of a woman, mentioning “her eyes” “29”. Beauty is immediately described as close to but separate from humanity. The voice of the poem states that it cannot look at the disorder that is humanity and, as a result, must turn away, physically disassociating itself from humanity by ignoring it, even though it is technically close enough in position to see it in the first place. Remember: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers Get an essay now.