Spanking your child has always been a heated discussion among guardians and non-guardians alike. There is every sign that we are on opposite sides of the dispute, those for and those against. Everyone offers evidence to support their case and both sides are strongly convinced in their beliefs. To give an understanding of the exchange, this article will try to clarify the positive and negative consequences for the children of each party to the conflict. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay. The motivation behind this is to investigate some of the purposes behind a spanking to test the appropriateness of the hitting and why we should even now authorize punishment for today's kids. While many adults argue that hitting people is not right, punishing children continues to be used as a satisfying form of order because many parents think that hitting will help children not do taboo things, to stop them. immediately when they are disturbed and urge them to do what they should. Some guardians also believe that nonphysical forms of control, such as timeouts, do not work. Spanking is also a workout used more in some areas of the country than others, especially in the southern United States, and in some societies more than others. Now how about we take a look at the general population who are against punishment and what they state as their argument. Trying to hit someone is not right. Hitting someone is a brutal activity. Brutality is something an individual does to hurt someone else. We must treat children in ways that do not destroy or harm them. Despite how painful the spanking method is for children, it does have some positive results. Some experts believe that spanking is essential when children do something wrong. In this way, guardians show their children that this is a negative issue. The torment of spanking would influence young people to remember the experience. Likewise, guardians could, by applying this training, distance themselves from the dangerous behavior of children on the streets, where traffic is fast and different conditions could cause harm to children. The other real claim of spanking followers is punishment. The statements of the general population that support spanking are accurate, but they do not see the hidden risk of this procedure. Children whose guardians often beat them in their youth have a higher risk of heart attacks and strokes in later life. Some connections, according to their point of view, can also be found regarding the increased risk of death, as well as problems with the respiratory system and physical discipline. Remember: this is just an example. Request a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay In any case, sometimes it is difficult to control the circumstance and the best way to educate children is to spank them. There are favorable circumstances and obstacles to training children by hitting them. However, guardians must spank their children in the most unusual way possible. Instead, they should have progressively relational discussions with them. Those for spanking believe it is a compelling strategy for order and does not appear to harm children in the long run. Those against it argue that spanking can cause young people to become violent later down the road and can make them more likely to encounter tension and pain. Plus, they include, there are better approaches to dealing with terrible behavior. Finally, spanking is a parental choice to be made on an individual basis.