History has shown that human beings have different skin colors with different background stories. Every ethnic group has faced some sort of bigotry towards them or their lifestyle. What most don't understand is that we are all one as a whole. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, a prominent political or more ideological leader of Indians in India, protested against the dogmatic views of what he and his Indian brothers and sisters were going through with the British. The actions presented were out of the way Caucasians treated others during this era of discrimination. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Even though discrimination was present through forms of segregation such as in America during the civil rights movement, Gandhi wanted to show the same concept that Martin Luther King later presented in the 1960s. The views of Gandhi's philosophy are deontological. This means that being a deontological philosopher you must act according to duty. Gandhi's idea of ​​nonviolence is to present oneself as a rational human being even if one has been violently beaten. The people of India have the right to govern themselves and they have the right to sell the products that have been taken from their land and resold to them. Gandhi's idea was to organize non-violent protests to demonstrate to the British that the ideas of Western civilization and industrialization are not worth imitating or transplanting to India. Gandhi's first attack to end the violence was when he was thrown out of a train traveling in a first class compartment. reserved for whites only because he wasn't white, even though he had a reserved ticket for that seat. This was a high point in his life. He felt that enough was enough. He and his countrymen had to put an end to the prejudicial actions that the British are imposing on him and his countrymen. Gandhi dictated that everyone is equal and that everyone should do all kinds of jobs. Even being a simple toilet cleaner which is the lowest caste in Indian traditions (Aharon 2000). This is an example of what Immanuel Kant's deontological ethics is. By doing any job, even the lowest of the low, Gandhi implies that they should act out of duty. Proving that even an engineer who is taught mathematical problems and physics concepts throughout his educational career can do a simple job that most would reject. If you don't act out of duty, according to Kant, you are unethical. By turning down a simple job because it disgraces your image as an engineer you are being unethical. If you act out of duty, in Kant's perspective, you are ethical, that is, if the engineer does the work because others are inclined to make the engineer feel guilty for not doing his part, and he goes and does it. This is unethical. If you do the work because you are influenced by others, this is a no to Kant's ethical philosophy. Gandhi shows everyone that he himself cleans toilets, proving that he, a lawyer, can do a simple job that everyone should do. Gandhi acts out of duty. This is one of the ways in which Gandhi's views are deontological. Gandhi's views on nonviolent actions towards the British brought to light many other ideas. One of the ideas put forth by Gandhi was a march to the Arabian Ocean, known as the Salt March (Gugel 1996). Launching a nonviolent protest is a step further from what Gandhi taught his countrymen. Seeing their rights recognised, having what is theirs, even if they didn't underline it verbally. Going into the ocean and harvestinggrains of salt, which was illegal due to the law imposed by the English, justified his actions as such. He is letting the English know that even though the laws are put in place for the purpose of controlling mankind, he will not be subject to their laws. He has the right to take it without any action. This is a hypothetical imperative. Do (A)! Act as (A)!Gandhi is the agent (X) who wants the salt which is object (O). He seeks Object (O) in order to demonstrate that the English have no right to impose severe taxes on a necessity that some desire (Gugel 1996). This is another topic of Kant's deontological ethics. The British at that time were in charge of major salt manufacturing factories which were causing insurgent actions such as salt smuggling into India (Aharon 2000). These actions against the government were deemed inappropriate. But the Indian people felt they were acting out of duty and the smuggling was justified due to the actions that British taxation was unfair and that only British licensed salt factories were the only distributors. Gandhi shows that by taking the grain of salt he is not respecting the laws because it shows that his actions are right. Doing A and looking for object O. Even though Gandhi acted out of duty with his non-violent protest, the brutal actions of the British towards him and not the reaction were another way of showing his vision of being a human being rational. As he sought to reclaim his rights as a British subject, he suffered abuse and mistreatment, soon after his fellow Indians were subjected to the same punishment as Gandhi. Gandhi's view on this point is what Kant would call a principle of ends. “Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in that of another, always at the same time as an end and never simply as a means” (Kant 36). By acting as fellow citizens and demonstrating that we are, we treat others the way we would like to be treated. This is one of Gandhi's main arguments. Since the British were in control of India, the Indians were under the same concept as the Americans during colonization. They were British subjects, but were denied rights that were as meaningful to them as it was to African Americans during the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s. The actions imposed by the English were unjust and worked against mankind. The British did not treat Indians with due respect as British subjects. Gandhi protested against nonviolence to show respect for his countrymen and to make the British treat them as their own countrymen. Many of Gandhi's subjects did not like his idea of ​​non-violence like Lokmanya Tilak. Tilak felt that he had to take severe or drastic measures. Gandhi convinced Indians to use his philosophy of nonviolence to prove that the British were wrong and that they should have their political rights (Aharon 2000). By treating others the way you would like to be treated, you are acting according to what Kant says, you are acting out of duty to be a rational human being instead of simply being a rational animal in Aristotle's concept. Acting like a rational human being and treating others like the way we want to be treated didn't always fit with the religions of that time. Gandhi as a Hindu moved his nation through nonviolent protest. But some fellow Hindu subjects believed that Gandhi was a traitor by being an intermediary between the two religions of Muslim and Hindu, while India was trying to gain independence. By acting like a better Hindu, a better Muslim, or a better Christian, you act towards a truth that is the ultimate reality. This is where his ideas about nonviolence come into play. Being a Hindu, Muslim or Christian the better you are..