Thousands of people lose their lives due to genetic inferiority. There are countless potentially lethal diseases and disorders that are contracted exclusively through inheritance. There seems to be nothing that those affected can do to prevent this, as it is predetermined by their DNA. However, recent advances in biomedical sciences have given hope to those affected by these genetic complications. Biologically engineered treatments have been identified for many insufferable inherited diseases. Along with biological self-improvement, some genetic modifications could also improve the lives of people affected by poverty and hunger. Organic meat production holds great promise for ending world hunger and saving more lives. Although bioengineering is considered an immensely productive and life-saving scientific advancement, there are some who think the practice is unethical. This is not true for several reasons. Overall, bioengineering could dramatically increase the lifespan of afflicted and malnourished people, benefiting the entire human race. This makes bioengineering an ethical practice because it improves the lives of thousands of people in many different ways. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay The most obvious improvement would be the production of biomedical treatments for genetic diseases. Infamous diseases that drastically devastate the human population can be easily treated, or even cured, as a result of further biomedical research. Diseases such as cancer could be contained and Alzheimer's disease could be completely cured in time (Donahue & SJ, 2017). Going further, regulating bioengineering in medicine could cure people with painful neuromuscular disorders, such as multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's disease, as well as other biological complications that affect an individual's daily life such as Down syndrome (Donahue, 2017). ). Additionally, biomedical engineering could be used for spinal cord regeneration, granting a paraplegic the ability to walk (Donahue, 2017). It is clear that bioengineering is ethical because it improves the health and lives of many otherwise hopeless individuals. The possibilities of bioengineering don't stop with patients; biological modifications could also end world hunger and livestock exhaustion. Just as deadly genetic diseases hinder human survival, drastic malnutrition is an additional problem affecting the population, but on a much larger scale. Hunger is a worldwide problem that kills more humans than any hereditary disease ever could. Fortunately, world hunger could also be effectively solved by regulating biological and genetic engineering. Embryonic cells recovered from pre-existing livestock can be modified to produce genetically modified meat that is safe for human consumption (Bartholet, 2017). Therefore, mass production of biologically modified foods could successfully address the immense problem of world hunger. This idea is not a theory or a possibility; growing edible meat in the laboratory has already been successfully achieved, making laboratory-grown meat a readily available solution (Bartholet, 2017). There are many other positive outcomes from genetically modified foods that are worth mentioning. Normalizing the consumption of lab-grown meat would also reduce the number of livestock slaughtered and the rate of extinction of most.