Equality in the Eyes of the LawMarriage is simply not for a same-sex couple. In the Philippines, Fonbuena (2015) reported that “up to 70% of respondents said they 'strongly disagree' with same-sex marriage being permitted in the predominantly Catholic country.” This means that most Filipinos believe that marriage is a union that only people in a heterosexual relationship should enjoy. Same-sex marriage legislation is highly unlikely due to the Philippines' predominantly Catholic background and the majority belief that a same-sex relationship cannot fulfill the primary reason for marriage which is procreation. Marriage is defined as “a special contract of permanent union between a man and a woman entered into in accordance with the law for the establishment of conjugal and family life” (Family Code of the Philippines, 1987). The law makes it very clear that marriage is exclusively for heterosexual couples. There is no mention of gays or lesbians. Not only that, but the law also states that the marriage can be annulled if either spouse is involved in homosexuality or lesbianism. This statement alone completely erases the possibility of homosexuals receiving the right to marry. Furthermore, the law emphasized that “marriage is the foundation of the family and an inviolable social institution.” Two men or two women cannot perpetuate human life due to the inability of reproduction and only with the help of modern technology can a child be had. Cytrynbaum, Grafodatskaya, and Weksberg (2013), stated that “with the increase in the rate of assisted reproductive technology (ART) and the total number of pregnancies, it has become evident that ART is associated with potential risks to the mother and the fetus." This means that although procreation is possible, the risks of birth defects and genetic diseases are high. According to the Central Intelligence Agency's World Factbook, the Philippines' total fertility rate is 3.02 children born per woman in 2017. These claims demonstrated that despite the ability for homosexuals to reproduce through ART, success rates they are still low compared to heterosexual ones. use the coitus method and shows that the purpose of procreation in marriage cannot be easily achieved by same-sex couples. Natural marriage provides society with the very foundation of civilization: the procreative family unit. However, legalizing same-sex marriage could weaken it, a study showed. Borreli (2013) reported that research conducted by the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP) suggested that “although children of LGBT parents are just as well adjusted as children with heterosexual parents, they may face some challenges.” According to psychologist Trayce Hansen (2012), same-sex marriage hurts and confuses children who grow up thinking that homosexuality is normal and that gender roles and expectations can be reversed. This threatens the institution of marriage and there may come a time when simply discussing same-sex marriage will already be considered discrimination. In conclusion, same-sex marriage cannot fulfill the definition of marriage between a man and a woman (as defined in the Family Code) nor the purpose of procreation, and will only serve to weaken the foundations of society and families. So there is no need to legalize same-sex marriage. Say no to plagiarism. Get an essay onmeasure on "Why violent video games should not be banned"? Get Original Essay A heterosexual marriage or a two-parent family, mother and father is in the best interests of a child. Some supporters of same-sex marriage think that all children really need is love. But according to research this is not the case. There are positive psychological effects that a mother and father can have on children. At the same time, the absence of both mother and father has negative effects on the child. Same-sex couples can adopt children from orphanages, but is it really in the child's best interest? Wilcox (2005) pointed out that most fathers and mothers possess sex-specific talents related to parenting. An enumeration of several unique talents of a mother which are breastfeeding, understanding, nurturing and comforting babies and children has been included. The different skills of fathers which are beneficial for the development of children are also mentioned in the test as they discipline, play and challenge the child to embrace life's challenges. Meyer (2007) stated that lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) people have a higher prevalence of mental disorders than heterosexuals. This is due to minority stress, which explains that stigma, prejudice and discrimination create a hostile and stressful social environment that causes mental health problems. Walton (2012) pointed out that “a parent's stress level can influence the child's very makeup, including risk for mood disorders, addiction, and even disorders such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and l 'autism". Willis (2017) stated that “children and adolescents with same-sex parents are emotionally affected when they and their families are exposed to homophobia, discrimination, prejudice and social stigma.” All of this can cause stress in children growing up with same-sex parents. The confusion arises from the dilemma of whether to follow the adoptive parents who are their primary role models or try to fit in with their friends or people around. The adoption law in the Philippines states that “the best interests of the child shall be the paramount consideration in all matters relating to his or her care, custody and adoption.” Which leads us to think: Is an environment full of discrimination in the best interests and well-being of children? The Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of RA 10627 of the Philippine Constitution otherwise known as the “Anti-Bullying Act of 2013” ​​included humiliation on the basis of perceived or actual sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) in bullying. However, no specific law has been passed to abolish discrimination against the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) community. Sabillo, (2015) reported, "it is shown that 85% of the 1,200 respondents agreed with the statement: 'Just like me, gays and lesbians also have the right to be protected against any form of discrimination .' Without discrimination against the LGBTQ community and their true acceptance in society, homosexual parents cannot provide the best environment for a child's social and psychological development. Therefore, legalizing same-sex marriage is not beneficial. Legalizing same-sex marriage in the Philippines is nothing more than an action to turn a moral wrong into a civil right that would result in critical cuts to the national budget and immense changes in both the law and our regulatory system in the country According to Global Finance (2017), the Philippines is ranked as the 69th largest country.