In a liberal democracy, the judiciary has four main responsibilities, including responding to judgments, resolving disputes, examining the rule of law, and defining the rule of law through interpretation and enforcement of laws than becoming athletes in state politics. To achieve these four tasks, the fundamental principles of a liberal democratic state must be maintained together with legitimate democracy and national principles. Furthermore, the judiciary should interpret and apply the law along with the Constitution and provide fair rulings on disputes between state, individual, individual and various levels of government within the government. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Relying on courts and judicial means to address fundamental moral dilemmas, political debates, and public policy issues is one of the most significant consequences of late 20th- and early 20th-century governance. Through recently adopted judicial review, high courts around the world are working to address a range of issues ranging from freedom of expression, freedom of religion, reproductive freedom and privacy, equitable rights, criminal justice, education, public policy on of process and process. I've been asked this often. As the political importance of courts has increased, they have become more prevalent than ever and have expanded to become a pluralistic phenomenon that far surpasses the political decisions of the current “standard” concept. The role of the judiciary in the community is not only what the judge does, but also how he acts. This is called judicial style. The style of the judge of the civil law jurisdiction and the style of the judge of the common law tradition are markedly different. In recent years there has been a demand for responsibility from all government agencies. It is necessary to harmonize with the principle of government independence. Many people are investing in the courts and people have the right to hear cases fairly and efficiently, to make decisions relatively quickly and to handle cases with due consideration. To achieve the characteristics of the judicial system, democracy in developed countries depends on the “judicial culture”. When a judge takes office, he or she pledges to uphold the rights of all citizens and combines the Constitution, self-integrity, peer pressure, and public inquiry to ensure that at least the highest-ranking judge follows his or her oath. It is necessary to strive towards achieving a complex and balanced balance, which favors the growth and development of reasonable and sound principles in accordance with the new law. The legislator should also be aware that the judiciary is a party to many disputes between citizens and the representatives with whom it deals and therefore cannot influence the functioning of the courts and the selection of personnel. The legislator must recognize that it is for this purpose, for example, to represent the citizens and act within the structure in compliance with the rules established by the Constitution. The role of the judiciary in the formulation or application of policy is a matter of expanded association, well beyond judicial review of administrative decisions. When policy formation is considered part of the judicial function, it is important to understand that it is ongoing and that it is understandable how judicial methods are linked to judicial and judicial capacity. Along with the development of the common law, there is the responsibility for the development of judges who follow the wisdom of the judge and.