When adolescent children take their first step into education, they do not wonder whether or not they will be isolated from the opposite sex. Many have started or transitioned to single-sex schools or education classes more frequently since parents were exposed to the benefits sought. Although many people view single-sex education with opposition, there are many opportunities and benefits that single-sex education offers. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Large cities often had single-sex schools, among numerous coeducational public schools, which were selective of students attending before World War II, but were still capable of carrying a large population. Since this concerned administrators, Title IX was passed in 1972 to ensure the equality of every government-funded educational program, regardless of sex, to prevent discrimination. Single-sex education was then banned, however, the Department of Education wanted to weaken the interpretation of Title IX as further research showed the benefits of single-sex classes in coeducational schools. Because of the research conducted and the No Child Left Behind Act passed by George W. Bush in 2001, the amount of single-sex public education has increased significantly. Single-sex education has therefore been seen to aid differences in the learning styles of boys and girls. Single-sex classrooms are created if they improve student achievement and provide versatile opportunities, while single-sex schools are created if the district can establish a school that is equivalent to one or both sexes. These systems are created to promote and guarantee the best education of children in which neither sex is excluded. There are those who believe that single-sex education creates an atmosphere of inequality. Research involving the different learning styles of the two genders had caused “gender stereotypes.” People often feel that the research collected subjects males and females to teaching in the way that others say is beneficial, but is believed to not always be correct. Single-sex classes reinforce the difference in learning styles from the beginning without a predisposition as to what techniques work for certain students and what don't. Single-sex education is not necessary if teachers are educated on how boys and girls learn in versatile ways and how to adapt to each student. Teachers don't have enough time to teach a concept in multiple ways and help students who don't understand it the first time it's taught. Additionally, single-sex classes do not prepare children for the real world. The real world is a life of integration where you will come into contact with other genders, different races, facing a lack or too much attention and power. By separating boys and girls into different classes, their education will show higher results but may put a strain on their social development. However, in single-sex classes, students interact, but when they focus on academics when they enter the classroom. When teaching in single-sex classrooms, teachers are more easily trained in how they will explicitly teach their students. Gender-segregated classrooms allow teachers to tailor their lessons to gender, which occurred for the first time in subjects such as language arts, math, science and academics.”.