To achieve sustainable mobility, many actions are based on Mobility Management (MM), also called Transportation Demand Management (TDM), which Jones [4] defines as 'motivating individuals voluntarily switch to more sustainable modes of transport by providing detailed information and travel stimuli and using marketing techniques focused on personal travel behavior. It emphasized the movement of people and goods, not just motor vehicles, and prioritized public transportation, ridesharing, and non-motorized modes [5]. The characteristics of MM measures are convenient, quick to implement, easy to modify and are a good support for infrastructure measures. A form of mobility management, related to travel to school, has been developed and implemented in many developed countries, namely Active School Transport, also known as Safe Routes to School, Active Travel to School, Active Transport, School Trip Active, Active Commute to School, Smart Trip to School and other names that more or less all mean the same thing as a neighborhood-building action that encourages people to actively walk or cycle to and from service stops [6]. Garrard [7] providing clear information and reference sources on the benefits of active transportation. She captures the important point of the benefits as shown in Figure 1. In short, the benefits of active transportation in terms of physical activity “will create greater bone density which is essential for protection against osteoporosis in later life” [8]. Furthermore, it will help reduce the prevalence of overweight and obesity. While in terms of mental health, it will minimize the possibility of psychological distress [9]. In the context of smart quotas... half of the paper... only recorded for those coming from school, which may be understandable since the speed of the rickshaw may not compete with other vehicles in the morning rush hour. From the data collected yes can state that the majority of students still use inefficient means of transport, motorbikes and cars, to travel to and from school, which exceed 50%. If this condition were to last longer, urban transport, already unsustainable, would become increasingly worse. Considering that the trip to school is classified as a regular trip made daily, it will consequently have a significant impact on Surakarta's urban transportation. Furthermore, given the existing conditions on the ground, morning rush hour traffic is mostly drop-off trips to school. Therefore, significant and better changes will occur in city traffic if the way students travel to school can be shifted towards more sustainable modes.